Use this deck to practise a method, not just definitions
The ACEM Primary assesses foundational sciences and their application to emergency medicine. It typically includes written components and structured oral or viva-style assessment. Candidates may need to explain mechanisms, interpret data and apply core principles to acute presentations under time pressure. Check the official ACEM website for current examination information rather than relying on a study guide for format details.
Acid–base interpretation is a useful area to practise because it combines definitions, equations, data interpretation and clinical reasoning. For each card below, try to give a short answer aloud before revealing the back. Then grade your recall honestly: use the lowest grade that matches how readily and accurately you answered. A correct answer that took a long pause, missed a unit or needed a prompt is not the same as fluent recall.
A MySummaries deck on acid–base interpretation could look like this:
What pH defines acidemia, and what pH defines alkalaemia?
Acidemia: arterial pH <7.35. Alkalaemia: arterial pH >7.45.
All 16 cards
That is a MySummaries deck, filled with ACEM Primary material. Yours is written from your own notes. Start free
Work through the cards in useful passes
Pass one: identify the primary process. For each question, say whether it asks for a definition, a reference value, a calculation or a mechanism. On an ABG, establish whether the blood is acidemic or alkalaemic, then ask which change in PaCO₂ or HCO₃⁻ could explain the pH. Do not start naming causes before you have established the pattern.
Pass two: calculate expected compensation. Winter’s formula is especially useful because it gives a testable expected range in metabolic acidosis. Calculate it rather than relying on “the CO₂ should be low”. Then compare the measured PaCO₂ with that range. If it does not fit, state that a mixed disorder is possible and explain which additional process the result suggests.
Pass three: link the pattern to a mechanism and an acute-care question. For example, a low PaCO₂ could reflect appropriate compensation, a primary respiratory alkalosis, or both. A candidate should connect the numbers to ventilation and the likely clinical context, not stop at a label. In an acute presentation, also consider whether the patient’s ventilation is failing or changing, and whether immediate assessment is needed. These cards are for science revision, not a substitute for clinical assessment or local protocols.
After each answer, use the four grade buttons according to your actual recall. Grade a correct but hesitant calculation lower than an immediate, accurate response. If you missed a unit, confused acute and chronic compensation, or could not explain the mechanism, mark that specific weakness mentally before moving on. The card tells you what to revisit; it does not prove that you can yet apply the fact in a longer answer.
The core facts to keep available
The deck is deliberately wider than the minimum set of facts to retrieve quickly. These four points are a compact check before you attempt a longer ABG interpretation:
When these are fluent, practise speaking a compact interpretation: name the primary process, give the key evidence, check compensation, then state the likely clinical significance. If you need to calculate, say the formula and units as you work. That makes errors easier to spot and keeps the explanation organised under questioning.
Turn repeated misses into a specific repair task
A missed card is more useful when it leads to one small task. If you repeatedly mix up acute and chronic respiratory compensation, compare the two figures and explain why renal adaptation changes the bicarbonate response over time. If you miss Winter’s formula, do a fresh calculation and check the arithmetic against the predicted range. If you remember the equation but cannot say what an out-of-range PaCO₂ means, practise the interpretation rather than repeating the equation alone.
A remediation prompt from a repeated error could look like this:
You lost this mark twice: HCO₃⁻ is 10 mmol/L in metabolic acidosis. Calculate the expected PaCO₂ using Winter’s formula, include the range, and explain what a measured PaCO₂ of 35 mmHg suggests.
A complete response would calculate 23 mmHg, with an expected range of 21–25 mmHg. A measured PaCO₂ of 35 mmHg is above that range and suggests an additional respiratory acidosis or inadequate ventilation. Practise saying both the calculation and the implication: knowing the number without interpreting it leaves the clinical reasoning unfinished.
How MySummaries helps
Build a revision board from your own PDFs, slides or photographed notes, then generate flashcards from that material. Use spaced repetition to revisit difficult facts, and connect the cards to written mock exams or viva practice when you need to apply them in longer answers. Start at portal.mysummaries.app.