Study guides

Biochemistry

4 guides for this subject — how to prepare, what to practise, and how to know it has gone in.

A practice question

Choose an answer and it is marked, with the explanation. From Biochemistry Practice Questions: 10 Worked MCQs.

Question 11 mark

An enzyme is studied with and without an inhibitor. In the presence of the inhibitor, the apparent Km increases but Vmax is unchanged. Which type of inhibition is most consistent with these findings?

Competitive inhibition increases the apparent Km because more substrate is needed to reach half Vmax, but sufficiently high substrate concentration can overcome the inhibition, so Vmax remains unchanged. The strongest distractor is uncompetitive inhibition: it lowers both apparent Km and Vmax because the inhibitor binds the enzyme–substrate complex.

Question 1 tests the effect of competitive inhibition on Michaelis–Menten parameters.

A spoken answer, marked

An examiner's question, answered out loud and marked criterion by criterion. From Biochemistry Viva Questions: A Practical Oral Method.

Oral — Enzyme kinetics and inhibitionMarked

Examiner

Explain how you would distinguish competitive from non-competitive inhibition using an enzyme assay.

2:363:00Mark answer
78%Enzyme kinetics and inhibition — marked78/100 · Developing · 2:36 spoken of 3:00
Biochemical accuracy16/20

You correctly stated that competitive inhibition raises apparent Km while leaving Vmax unchanged in the ideal case.

ImproveState that pure non-competitive inhibition lowers Vmax without changing Km, then qualify that real mixed inhibition can change both parameters.

Experimental reasoning15/20

You proposed measuring initial rates over several substrate concentrations with and without inhibitor.

ImproveName technical replicates and explain why substrate, enzyme, pH and temperature must be controlled.

Data interpretation14/20

You recognised that the pattern should be judged from fitted kinetic data rather than one reaction tube.

ImproveExplain what result would support each model and avoid treating a Lineweaver–Burk plot as automatically definitive.

Clear communication16/20

The answer followed a sensible definition, experiment and interpretation order.

ImproveGive the direct distinction in the first sentence before discussing the graph.

A strong answerI would measure initial reaction rates across a range of substrate concentrations, both without inhibitor and at a defined inhibitor concentration, while keeping enzyme, pH, temperature and ionic conditions constant. In the ideal competitive model, the apparent Km increases but Vmax is unchanged because sufficiently high substrate can overcome competition for the active site. In pure non-competitive inhibition, Vmax decreases while Km is unchanged, although real inhibitors may show mixed behaviour and alter both values. I would fit the data using an appropriate nonlinear model, include blanks and replicates, and use the residuals and confidence intervals rather than relying only on a linearised plot.

Start studying biochemistry

Yours are written from your own notes, and the free plan needs no payment details.

Guides

Studying biochemistry? Build your biochemistry board from your own notes — the cards, papers and lectures are written from it. Free plan: 20 cards, a paper, a lecture and a viva to try.

Start on MySummaries

Other subjects