GRE

I agree in principle because internships connect academic ideas to workplace decisions and can help students test possible careers. They may also build communication skills through supervised tasks. However, a universal requirement could disadvantage students who need paid work or who study subjects where suitable placements are scarce. Universities should therefore offer funded placements or equivalent projects rather than impose one identical requirement.

The position is clear and the qualification is relevant. The first reason is explained, but the second is asserted more than demonstrated.

Model answerThesis: I agree only if universities provide accessible alternatives. Reasons and evidence: A supervised placement can show how academic knowledge informs decisions; for example, a public-health student could evaluate how a local service uses survey data. Qualification: A compulsory unpaid placement may exclude students with financial or access constraints. Conclusion: Funded placements or assessed equivalent projects would retain the practical benefit without making opportunity depend on personal circumstances.